Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt

musculoskeletal system

- Musculoskeletal system – Chronic pain with polyarthritis and osteoporosis

After decades of pain a significant alleviation.

The 68 year-old patient had been suffering from polyarthritis with deformed joints for 45 years. Furthermore …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

- Musculoskeletal system – Patellar tendonitis

Patient pain-free after one month.

The 44 year-old patient suffered from a very painful patellar tendonitis. He had …

Filed in:

Read »

- Pain – Hip pain and paraesthesia.

After nine months the patient was symptom free.

The 56 year old patient suffered severe pain in the right hip and from …

Filed in: ,

Read »

- Pain – Sciatic pain

Symptom-free after four months.

The 49 year old patient suffered the typical sciatic nerve complaints. That is to say, severe pains …

Filed in: ,

Read »

- Pain – Neck pain, dizziness and hypertension

After two months, the patient was symptom-free.

The 56 year old patient suffered neck pain and fits of dizziness. She also showed …

Filed in: , , ,

Read »

- Pain – Pain in the forearm

Problem solved after two months

For a year the 47 year old patient had been suffering constant pain in the region of the lower arm …

Filed in: ,

Read »

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.