Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt

- Abdominal discomfort – Abdominal pain and bloating

Long-term abdominal discomfort and neurodermatitis cleared.

A 25 year old patient suffered from abdominal pain since her childhood, with flatulence, bloating and constipation. She also suffered from neurodermatitis. Bioresonance testing according to Paul Schmidt indicated an energy regulation disorder of the immune system with an indication of typical microorganisms of the mucous membranes, especially in the digestive system. After an appropriate therpay the patient is currently free of discomfort.

To Specialist Report »

Reported by Heilpraktikerin (naturopath) Ute Laufenberg, Attendorn.


To log in to the specialist area, please use the access data that you have received either from DocCheck or as a member of the VFS Association for the Promotion of Vibrational Medicine. You have already learned and approved the necessary data protection conditions there. Please also refer to our Privacy policy for the use of our pages.

Zugang für Mitglieder der Vereinigung zur Förderung der Schwingungsmedizin e.V.:

Falls Sie Ihre Mitglieder-Zugangsdaten noch nicht haben, registrieren Sie sich bitte über die Geschäftsstelle der Vereinigung.

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.