Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt


- Pain – Knee pain, upper abdominal pain and overweight

After three months pain-free. Lost six kilograms.

The 63 year-old patient suffered from swellings and severe pain in the knee. She often suffered …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

- Obesity, overweight and depression

Woman with multiple symptoms cured after three weeks. Successful weight loss.

The patient aged 64 suffered from a range of health problems, including excess weight, circulatory problems, …

Filed in: ,

Read »

- Obesity, overweight and arthritis

Significant weight loss and disappearance of knee pain.

The 54-year-old patient was overweight, and suffered from knee and back pain, mainly …

Filed in: , , ,

Read »

- Obesity excess weight and knee pain

Weight loss and painless knee joints.

At 140 kg, this 50-year-old man was overweight. He had tried a number of diets since the year 2000, all of them unsuccessful. He also …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.