Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt

joints

- Musculoskeletal system – Chronic pain with polyarthritis and osteoporosis

After decades of pain a significant alleviation.

The 68 year-old patient had been suffering from polyarthritis with deformed joints for 45 years. Furthermore …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

- Pain – multiple joint pain with episodes of fever

Patient now pain-free.

The 50 year-old patient suffered from severe and persistent pain alternating between the different joints of the whole body. These were …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

- Pains – swellings and pains in the joints, fingers and back

After two and a half months, the patient was pain- and symptom-free.

The patient suffered from swelling and pain in the joints, especially in the fingers of the right hand, 2nd to 4th finger …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

- Joints – pain in the wrists

After years of suffering from the symptoms, the patient is now free of pain.

The 70-year-old patient had been suffering from migrating joint inflammation for years that eventually manifested in …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

- Obesity, overweight and arthritis

Significant weight loss and disappearance of knee pain.

The 54-year-old patient was overweight, and suffered from knee and back pain, mainly …

Filed in: , , ,

Read »

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.