Heart – Irregular and fast cardiac rhythm « Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

H - Heart – Irregular and fast cardiac rhythm

After four treatments the cardiac rhythm was normalised.

The 41-year-old patient suffered from a very irregular and fast cardiac heart rhythm, through to painful feelings in the chest. Markedly increased pulse frequency. The complaints raided him whether at rest or in motion. When he took a deep breath, he felt better.

Bioresonance analysis revealed energetic disturbances of the nervous system, immune system and digestive system.

Already after four therapy sessions the cardiac rhythm of the patient was normalised and symptom free.

To Specialist Report »

Reported by Kerstin Peuschel, Specialist in Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Naturopathy, Paul-Schmidt-Klinik (PSK), Berlingerode.

Zugang für Mitglieder der Vereinigung zur Förderung der Schwingungsmedizin e.V.:

Falls Sie Ihre Mitglieder-Zugangsdaten noch nicht haben, registrieren Sie sich bitte über die Geschäftsstelle der Vereinigung.

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.