Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt

A-D

- Digestion – upper abdominal pain, flatulence, colic

After three months, the abdominal symptoms were resolved.

This 62-year-old patient suffered from significant digestive problems. In this context, she experienced upper …

Filed in: ,

Read »

- Digestion – various stomach complaints

After five weeks, the patient was symptom-free.

The 33-year-old patient suffered from gastrointestinal complaints with a feeling of fullness, painful …

Filed in: ,

Read »

- Digestion – Digestive problems due to dysregulation

After four weeks, the child felt much better.

The six months old patient suffered from severe pain in the abdomen and diarrhoea. Excessive …

Filed in: ,

Read »

- Digestive problems and weight gain

Better digestion and successful weight loss.

This 29-year-old woman gained a significant amount of weight over a very short time, even though her dietary habits had not changed. Bowel movements …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.