Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt

- Allergy – Contact allergy (type IV)

Skin allergy calmed down slowly and progressively.

The 57 year-old patient suffered from a contact allergy for years with continuously swollen hands, painful, open and bleeding areas in the skin folds.

Bioresonance analysis revealed energetic dysregulation of the digestive tract, the liver-gall-pancreas system, the immune system in terms of defences against bacterial and viral microorganisms, the nervous system and the skin.

The skin remained problematic for a long time, then continued to improve, so that by now the wounds are healed, the skin is soft and the hands can be freely moved again.

To Specialist Report »

Reported by Susanne Kimmerle, naturopath, Reutlingen.

Zugang für Mitglieder der Vereinigung zur Förderung der Schwingungsmedizin e.V.:

Falls Sie Ihre Mitglieder-Zugangsdaten noch nicht haben, registrieren Sie sich bitte über die Geschäftsstelle der Vereinigung.

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.