Nervous system – Parkinson’s disease « Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

N - Nervous system – Parkinson’s disease

Patient stabilized and coping better with everyday life after six months.

This 61-year-old patient suffered from tremors and lack of interest in his surroundings, had slowed down, struggled to find his words and had diabetes mellitus.

Bioresonance analysis revealed energetic dysregulation of the nervous system, hormone balance and circulatory system/blood flow. In addition, there were clear indications of energetically disturbed ratios in the area of harmful substances.

After six months, the patient’s condition was stabilized and he coped better with everyday life. Henceforth he only experienced tremors when under stress.

To Specialist Report »

Reported by Kerstin Peuschel, Specialist in Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Naturopathy, Paul-Schmidt-Klinik (PSK), Berlingerode.

Zugang für Mitglieder der Vereinigung zur Förderung der Schwingungsmedizin e.V.:

Falls Sie Ihre Mitglieder-Zugangsdaten noch nicht haben, registrieren Sie sich bitte über die Geschäftsstelle der Vereinigung.

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.