Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt

- Pains – swellings and pains in the joints, fingers and back

After two and a half months, the patient was pain- and symptom-free.

The patient suffered from swelling and pain in the joints, especially in the fingers of the right hand, 2nd to 4th finger. Gradual development of a limited mobility. Also pain in the back.

Bioresonance analysis revealed energetic dysregulation of the acid-base balance, endocrine system, immune system, in particular in terms of the immune defence against pollutants and bacterial microorganisms, as well as of the musculoskeletal system.

After two and a half months, the patient was pain- and symptom-free.

To Specialist Report »

Reported by Kerstin Peuschel, Specialist in Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Naturopathy, Paul-Schmidt-Klinik (PSK), Berlingerode.

Zugang für Mitglieder der Vereinigung zur Förderung der Schwingungsmedizin e.V.:

Falls Sie Ihre Mitglieder-Zugangsdaten noch nicht haben, registrieren Sie sich bitte über die Geschäftsstelle der Vereinigung.

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.