Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt

- Stomach – undefined abdominal discomfort and lump in the throat

Patient feels well again.

The 48 year-old patient had been suffering for years from undefined and continuous abdominal discomfort with inflammation and abdominal pain. Furthermore, she often felt a kind of pressure in the larynx area (“lump in the throat”). Pale, dry skin with dark circles under the eyes.

Energetic regulation disorders of the digestive tract, including the liver-gall-pancreas system, the immune system in terms of immune defences against bacterial, viral and parasitic microorganisms and the endocrine system.

The patient feels well again, the skin improved significantly. In laboratory testing CRP levels decreased considerably.

To Specialist Report »

Reported by Kerstin Otto, Naturopath, Rangsdorf (Germany)

Zugang für Mitglieder der Vereinigung zur Förderung der Schwingungsmedizin e.V.:

Falls Sie Ihre Mitglieder-Zugangsdaten noch nicht haben, registrieren Sie sich bitte über die Geschäftsstelle der Vereinigung.

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.