Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt

nervous system

- Nervous system – visual field loss, dizziness and visual disturbances

After three months, the patient felt much better.

This 31-year old patient suffered from left visual field loss (black), with headaches and numbness of the left half of the face. This was associated with …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

- Psyche – nervous system, endocrine system and anxiety

The patient no longer gets anxiety attacks.

54 year-old woman with various anxiety disorders, claustrophobia, paranoia, fear of …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

- CNS – Vertigo and immune system

Relief from vertigo

This 47 year-old women had suffered from vertigo for some time. Otherwise …

Filed in: ,

Read »

- Nervous System – Nervous System and Lyme disease

Mental and physical state more stable after course of bioresonance therapy.

This 63-year-old patient exhibited signs of burnout and tingling in the toes. In addition to …

Filed in:

Read »

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.