Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt

- Immune system – Fever attacks after insect bite

Patient recovered within six weeks.

During a holiday in Thailand the 19-year-old patient suddenly developed a high fever, after he was stung by an insect. Local examination couldn’t confirm the suspicion of dengue fever. After his return, also extensive examinations by a doctor and in the laboratory led to nothing. He was constantly tired and exhausted. Short-term fever attacks kept occurring.

Energetic dysregulation of the lymphatic system, the liver-gall-pancreas system and in the immune system in terms of defences against the viral microorganisms.

After a period of six weeks he fully recovered. The fever disappeared and the patient was fully able-bodied.

To Specialist Report »

Submitted by Michael Petersen, naturopath, Lindenberg im Allgäu.

Zugang für Mitglieder der Vereinigung zur Förderung der Schwingungsmedizin e.V.:

Falls Sie Ihre Mitglieder-Zugangsdaten noch nicht haben, registrieren Sie sich bitte über die Geschäftsstelle der Vereinigung.

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.