Allergy – severe reactions to food « Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

A - Allergy – severe reactions to food

Patient is able to tolerate nearly every type of food again.

The 26-year-old patient had been suffering from the most severe allergies to a multitude of foodstuffs, such as soy, fruits and vegetables, which led to the admittance to the emergency room several times.

The bioresonance analysis showed regulation disorders of the digestive and immune system, in particular with regard to the immune system’s defence against bacteria and fungi, as well as to the energetic regulation of the vital substances, enzymes and acid-alkaline balance.

After the treatments within a six months period, the patient is able to eat nearly everything again. Even soy products no longer cause any allergic reaction. A slight tingling in the mouth may occur every now and then.

To Specialist Report »

Issued by Dr. Heike Schneider-Klein, naturopath, 55124 Mainz.

Zugang für Mitglieder der Vereinigung zur Förderung der Schwingungsmedizin e.V.:

Falls Sie Ihre Mitglieder-Zugangsdaten noch nicht haben, registrieren Sie sich bitte über die Geschäftsstelle der Vereinigung.

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.