Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt

stomach

- Digestion – various stomach complaints

After five weeks, the patient was symptom-free.

The 33-year-old patient suffered from gastrointestinal complaints with a feeling of fullness, painful …

Filed in: ,

Read »

- Stomach – undefined abdominal discomfort and lump in the throat

Patient feels well again.

The 48 year-old patient had been suffering for years from undefined and continuous abdominal discomfort with inflammation and abdominal pain. Furthermore …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

- Back – backache and stomach pain

After four months, the patient was pain-free.

The 46 year-old patient suffered from backaches between the shoulder blades. Furthermore …

Filed in: ,

Read »

- Pain – Knee pain, upper abdominal pain and overweight

After three months pain-free. Lost six kilograms.

The 63 year-old patient suffered from swellings and severe pain in the knee. She often suffered …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

- Stomach – Stomach pain with Helicobacter pylori

The patient is now symptom-free.

For years, the 56-year-old patient had been suffering from stomach pain after food intake, partially …

Filed in:

Read »

- Stomach – abdominal pain (cramps) and diarrhoea

Already a significant improvement after four days. Abdominal pain (cramps) and diarrhoea disappeared.

The 9-year old patient suffered recurrent vague abdominal pain with diarrhoea. She had …

Filed in: , ,

Read »

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.