Experience Reports Bioresonance according to Paul Schmitt

Case reports relating to Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt

- Musculoskeletal system – Chronic pain with polyarthritis and osteoporosis

After decades of pain a significant alleviation.

The 68 year-old patient had been suffering from polyarthritis with deformed joints for 45 years. Furthermore, osteoporosis and wound healing disturbance were added to this. The general condition was correspondingly poor.

Bioresonance analysis revealed energetic regulation disorders of the immune system, in particular in terms of immune defences against bacterial and viral microorganisms and energetic disturbances in cells of the musculoskeletal system.

After many years of complaints the patient felt much better. The laboratory values regarding the osteoporosis are again within normal range. The bone density measurement only showed abnormalities in the left hip. All other bones have recovered.

To Specialist Report »

Reported by Beate Borkenfels, naturopath, Kamen.

Zugang für Mitglieder der Vereinigung zur Förderung der Schwingungsmedizin e.V.:

Falls Sie Ihre Mitglieder-Zugangsdaten noch nicht haben, registrieren Sie sich bitte über die Geschäftsstelle der Vereinigung.

Important information: All information in the case reports refer to the energetic approach and must not be confused with the conventional medical point of view. Bioresonance falls within the domain of empirical medicine. Traditional orthodox medicine does not currently accept or even recognise the effects of bioenergetic oscillations. Therefore, the correlations described go sometimes far beyond the current state of science. These pages are for your information and inspiration only. They are not a substitute for a doctor or naturopath in case of a specific illness. The specialist reports are meant for orientation and learning purposes. They are not suitable as therapy recommendations for other cases. This also applies to similar cases. It always depends on the individual circumstances of each case. The specialist reports are therefore no substitute for a specific individual examination and treatment of each patient. The reports are mere reproductions of experiences that individual users had in individual cases. In no way can effectiveness claims be associated herewith. Nor should the impression be created that these experiences can basically be applied in all cases. There are no promised cures associated either. This would also not be permissible in terms of law and order.